Thursday, December 27, 2007

Benazir Bhutto



I literally gasped when I heard the news in the car this morning. Of course, it's more of a shock than a surprise. And, though I don't pretend to be an expert on international policy, I do sense from everything that I've read and heard that this is potentially a very, very significant event and one that we need to watch closely.

As a news junkie, I am always interested in knowing how the mainstream media covers these events. I listed on NPR most of the day and the coverage was terrific--mix of hard news, commentary and BBC. But I was also pleasantly surprised by the coverage n network news tonight. All three broadcasts spent atleast 40% of their airtime on the story, though ABC was the only one with its own correspondent on the ground. That said, i was dissapointed that none of the three anchors could bother to interrupt their holiday vacations to return to the studio. I tell you--Dan, Tom and Peter would have been there.

More than you need to know...

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

The Lives of Others

I haven't written in awhile and I'm not even sure anyone is still reading. Life has been fine, but I haven't felt the need or urge to write--until now.

I just finished watching for the second time in 24 hours, "The Lives of Others," which won this year's Academy Award for Best Foreign Film. The acting, the story, the cinematography are all haunting and hauntingly beautiful. And, as many reviewers have noted, it could have ended several times before it did. But it ended in the best possible way.

It's on DVD now, with some wonderful features, including a director's narrated version, which makes the second viewing essential.

Loved it. And for someone who usually can't stand subtitles or long movies and falls asleep even in the best of films, that's saying a lot.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Obama?

I'm a political junkie, watching and reading everything from Meet the Press, Keith Olberman, politico.com and any op-ed by Maureen Dowd, or, occasionally, Bob Herbert.

The next 350 days or so will be fascinating, but right now I'm focused on Iowa (January 3) and New Hampshire (January 8). I've been a long-time believer of the inevitability of Hilary Clinton as the Democratic nominee, but the past few weeks have tested that assumption. Polls (notoriously inaccurate in early states) now say that Obama is in the lead and the pundits seem to think so, too. I'm still not convinced that, as Bob Herbert said recently, that there is enough "there there," but I am also increasingly wary of the endless political calculations of Hilary. Still, the idea of having First Man Bill keeps me believing.

Monday, December 3, 2007

Keith Olberman


If I don't blog on any given evening, it's more than likely because I'm watching Keith Olberman on MSNBC. In simple terms, Keith is the liberal's answer to Bill O'Reilly.

But really, he's much more than that. He's handsome, first of all. Secondly, he has a brain. And he has great, really smart guests.

And, his "worst person in the world" segment is as good as any SNL "Weekend Update."

Weeknights at 8 on MSNBC. Check it out. Same time as O'Reilly, so you'll have to turn that crap off.

Vegas, Baby


I've been blog-absent for the past week. I spent most of it in Vegas for a work-related trip. It was my fourth trip to Sin City and I can't say that I miss it. Stayed at the Mandalay Bay, which was just fine, but I can't help but get irritated everytime I'm there by the boob-infested waitresses and the fugly middle-aged men ogling them like cotton candy.

It's just wrong.

Would I feel that way if it were a twenty-something chiseled dark-haired guy named Chester? Well, that person doesn't exist in Vegas, so I don't have to answer that question.

Monday, November 26, 2007

Life is Good


I'm a huge fan of consumer culture--why ideas stick, what gets people talking, etc. I thought that this article in the NY Times was great in showing how a no-budget company became a great brand.

I love my Life is Good Hat.

Millions in Sales From 3 Simple Words

By GLENN RIFKIN
Even though he broke his foot dancing at his brother’s wedding one recent weekend, life is still good for Bert Jacobs.

Mr. Jacobs is the 42-year-old co-founder of Life is good, a popular apparel brand based in Boston that is on track to break $100 million in sales this year. This is rarefied air for Mr. Jacobs, who a dozen years ago was selling T-shirts out of a battered van on the streets of Boston with his brother John, now 39.

From a single childlike drawing of a character they named Jake and their uplifting three-word slogan, the brothers have developed a fashion brand sold in 4,500 independent retail outlets in the United States and 27 other countries.

Since 1994, they have sold nearly 20 million Life is good T-shirts and now have a product line with more than 900 items, from hats to dog beds, and the company continues to grow 30 to 40 percent annually. There are now 93 independently owned Life is good retail shops selling only their merchandise, and the company plans to have a total of 200 by the end of 2009. With all that, Life is good has just 250 employees.

Life is good, which rations its use of capital letters, offers one more example of a small company creating a big brand. Though most consumers associate great brands with marketing giants like Procter & Gamble, General Motors, Apple and Nike, the ability to build a powerful brand is no longer reserved for the big spenders. Small companies with great ideas and well-planned strategies — Kryptonite bicycle locks, Stonyfield Farm yogurt, Zipcar — have spawned prominent brands.

“A big brand comes from big insights about culture and consumers and what it is that they need,” said Susan Fournier, a brand expert and associate professor of marketing at the School of Management at Boston University. “To me, that has nothing to do with big budgets.”

“Life is good tapped into an emotional ethos that struck a chord with where the culture was at a certain point in time. That is not done by a marketing budget but by their customers who become evangelists and give the brand visibility and credibility.”

Internet start-ups like Google, YouTube, Craigslist and Facebook used the Web to promote themselves and have now grown into giants themselves. Facebook, the popular social networking Web site, for example, was started in a Harvard dormitory room by three undergraduates less than four years ago, and today, with just over 300 employees, has nearly 50 million active users and has been signing up 200,000 new ones a day since January. New brands can be started online with stunning speed and efficiency by small groups of entrepreneurs who understand the impact of the viral environment of the Web.

Creating that ubiquity for a brand in the nondigital world is tougher. Though they had been reasonably content to sell enough of their wares to pay a meager rent and avoid taking real jobs, the Jacobs brothers always believed that they could make a better T-shirt and turn it into a bona fide business.

They posted their own drawings and slogans on the wall of their apartment near Boston and regularly polled friends at their frequent keg parties for feedback about their ideas. “It was truly like a focus group,” Bert Jacobs recalled.

In search of something that would resonate with a broad audience, they created Jake, a crudely drawn stick character not all that far removed from the Smiley Face, and were amazed at how he inspired an intensely positive reaction.

“This guy has life figured out,” wrote one friend next to the drawing.

They later posted a list of 50 slogans they had compiled and got a similar reaction to the unremarkable phrase “life is good.” A girlfriend concluded that the slogan with three simple words “kind of says it all.”

The brothers printed 48 test T-shirts that combined the slogan with the drawing for a street fair in Cambridge, Mass., in 1994, and sold the entire lot in 45 minutes.

That night, the brothers huddled and decided that the gold they had seemingly struck was a result of their message of optimism. “The reason people bought those shirts was because they understood it instantly,” Bert Jacobs said. “It made them smile, and it was tangible. They could reach out and get a little sunshine.”

Doug Gladstone, chief executive of Brand Content, an ad agency in Boston, agreed. “They tapped into something positive yet benign,” he said. “The product makes you feel good but it’s not over the top.”

By the end of 1994, the brothers had sold $82,000 of Life is good shirts through a couple of willing retail outlets. Within four years, they broke the $1 million barrier and believed they had found the small business they had always dreamed of and that they were sitting on an emerging brand.

The outside world did not see it that way. “It was a real uphill battle to get other people to say we had a brand,” Bert Jacobs said. “At $10 million and even $20 million in sales, they were still asking us when we were going to launch something different.”

With no business acumen, the brothers sought out successful retailers and peppered them with questions. Bert Jacobs acknowledged that smarter businessmen could have expanded the company more quickly but that was never the point.

Prof. Fournier said that slow growth is an asset for small companies trying to build brands.

“People with deep pockets put the pedal to the metal and do too much too quickly,” she said. “Big companies try to do everything in the first two years but often fall off the cliff. Small companies have to hold back and build the brand more carefully and diligently. Slow and steady often wins the race.”

The Jacobs brothers considered a consumer advertising campaign several years ago but decided to wait until growth slowed to start it. Growth has never slowed. Instead of advertising, the company spends its money on charitable fund-raising festivals for children’s causes.

“People who are facing adversity embrace our message the most,” Bert Jacobs said.

Skeptics have warned the brothers that their concept has a limited shelf life, and, indeed, they plan to extend the brand to try to keep it vibrant. Next spring, Life is good plans to start several apparel and product lines like Good Karma, Good Kids, Good Dog and Good Vibes that will aim at specific audiences. Good Karma, for example, is an environmentally sustainable clothing line. Good Kids will extend the product line for children.

Bert Jacobs is confident the brand has legs. “So much of fashion and culture is cyclical. It comes and goes,” he said. “When the trend tails off, so does your business. But optimism is not a trend. It’s empowering to celebrate life’s simple pleasures.”

Saturday, November 17, 2007

My New Best Friend

Click on the link above. I love this guy.

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Lucy, Carol and Mary




These three comedic geniuses have brought me laughs throughout my life. And I was reminded how much I love them by the PBS "American Masters" program last week on Carol Burnett. Thanks to Sammy for encouraging me to watch it, despite the mediocre review in the stodgy NY Times. If you get a chance to watch it, you'll love it.

I've always been a Lucy fanatic-even as a young kid I raced home to watch the escapades of Lucy, Ethel, Ricky and Fred. Still, years later, when I've seen every episode atleast seven times, I laugh and laugh some more.

And Mary Tyler more-a different type of funny, but still, I loved watching her, Mr Grant, Murray and the gang and stop everything when a re-run comes on.

Sure, there are some modern day actors and actresses that are amazingly talented and funny--Seinfeld, Wil and Grace, The Office and, from my childhood--Three's Company and Happy Days, but it's not the same. Those 70s shows have dated and modern tv is of the moment, but there's not the pure, innocent, great fun that these three ladies continue to bring me today.

Thursday, November 8, 2007

The Yankee Prankee

I was never a prankster, but you gotta give this guy some credit...

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1774718

Saturday, November 3, 2007

Bourne

I saw the final movie in this trilogy, Bourne Supremacy, in the theatres a few months ago and loved it. I hadn't seen the first two in the series and, to be honest, am not a fan of even the best action-adventure flicks. Bond is fine and the latest was very good, but I'll never run to this genre of flick.

So, I went back today and watched Bourne Identity. Great flick. And Matt Damon has become a great movie star. No Leonardo DiCaprio, but he's one heck of a talented young actor.

Looking forward to watching Bourne Ultimatum.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

I'm a happy camper

My entire (technical) life fell apart on Sunday. I had Comcast install high speed cable and DVR to replace my phone line and Tivo. Great way to save a few bucks. All was fine when the installation took place on Friday, but by Friday night, nothing worked. I had to have a friend do some fancy footwork to allow me to watch the World Series. Then, on Sunday, I spilled water on my blackberry/personal phone. On the fritz.

No phone. Not cable. No DVR. Virtually no internet access.

I was lost. And the Sunday NY Times sucked. And I had no luck with the crossword.

Reminded me of life in the early 1990s.

All is repaired today. As I sit on my lazy ass and type this on my wireless connection while watching the evening news.

But damn, it sucks to have missed a few nights of the Daily Show.

What has happened to us?

Monday, October 29, 2007

Red Sox in 4

Yes, it feels great. But there's something different the second time around in 86 years. No neuroses. No angst. No fear that, with one out in the ninth, Ellsbury would bumble the near home run and the self-destruction would begin.

It was talked about at the office today, but it didn't take over the day. No one wore Red Sox t-shirts. Over and again, everyone I talked to was proud/excited, but most of all, glad to get some sleep again.

And, talk has immediately turned to the 8-0 Patriots, who play the 8-0 Colts this weekend. I couldn't care less.

I can't wait for opening day in '08.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Gay Men Earn Less. Here's Why.



Courtesy of Time.com.

Gay men earn less. But not lesbians.
So says a new study:
Gay men working in management and traditional blue-collar, male-dominated jobs make less than straight men because they are discriminated against by their employers, according to new research released today by the University of New Hampshire Whittemore School of Business and Economics. Lesbians, however, do not experience similar discrimination in the labor market.
Bruce Elmslie, professor of economics, and his co-author Edinaldo Tebaldi, former assistant professor of economics at UNH and now at Bryant University, published their research in the Journal of Labor Research in an article titled “Sexual Orientation and Labor Market Discrimination.” The authors analyzed labor and wage information from more than 91,000 heterosexual and homosexual couples collected by the U.S. Census March 2004 Current Population Survey.
According to the authors, "gay men who live together earn 23% less than married men, and 9% less than unmarried heterosexual men who live with a woman. Discrimination is most pronounced in management and blue-collar, male-dominated occupations such as building and grounds cleaning and maintenance; construction and extraction; and production."
This isn't true for gay women, however. The authors conclude that
while negative attitudes toward lesbians could affect them, lesbians may benefit from the perception that they are more career-focused and less likely to leave the labor market to raise children than heterosexual women. According to their study, 18.1% of lesbians have children, compared with 49.4% of straight women.
So employers stereotype lesbians as being more committed to the job and not as likely to have kids. But why should gay men earn less? Three reasons, say the authors: bias by employers, bias by customers and fear of AIDS.
“Employers may disapprove of gay lifestyles and act on this bias in making hiring decisions,” the authors said. Employers also may discriminate against gay men in response to the desires of the majority of employees. If employers consider mixing heterosexual and homosexual employees distracting and detrimental to productivity, the authors said the employers may consider it profitable to discriminate.

Gay men also may experience labor market discrimination because customers may not want to interact with them, thus influencing hiring practices. “If customers prefer to interact with heterosexual employees, the owner will act on the customer’s taste for discrimination,” the authors said.
Finally, discrimination may occur as a result of anti-gay attitudes associated with AIDS and misunderstanding as to how HIV is transmitted. Previous research shows that people with HIV/AIDS have higher rates of absenteeism from work. The authors theorize that biased employers may be reluctant to hire gay men because they are concerned about a loss of productivity if a worker becomes infected with HIV/AIDS.

Gay Men

Gay men earn less. But not lesbians.
Posted by Lisa Takeuchi Cullen | Comments (15) | Permalink | Trackbacks (0) | Email This
So says a new study:
Gay men working in management and traditional blue-collar, male-dominated jobs make less than straight men because they are discriminated against by their employers, according to new research released today by the University of New Hampshire Whittemore School of Business and Economics. Lesbians, however, do not experience similar discrimination in the labor market.
Bruce Elmslie, professor of economics, and his co-author Edinaldo Tebaldi, former assistant professor of economics at UNH and now at Bryant University, published their research in the Journal of Labor Research in an article titled “Sexual Orientation and Labor Market Discrimination.” The authors analyzed labor and wage information from more than 91,000 heterosexual and homosexual couples collected by the U.S. Census March 2004 Current Population Survey.
According to the authors, "gay men who live together earn 23% less than married men, and 9% less than unmarried heterosexual men who live with a woman. Discrimination is most pronounced in management and blue-collar, male-dominated occupations such as building and grounds cleaning and maintenance; construction and extraction; and production."
This isn't true for gay women, however. The authors conclude that
while negative attitudes toward lesbians could affect them, lesbians may benefit from the perception that they are more career-focused and less likely to leave the labor market to raise children than heterosexual women. According to their study, 18.1% of lesbians have children, compared with 49.4% of straight women.
So employers stereotype lesbians as being more committed to the job and not as likely to have kids. But why should gay men earn less? Three reasons, say the authors: bias by employers, bias by customers and fear of AIDS.
“Employers may disapprove of gay lifestyles and act on this bias in making hiring decisions,” the authors said. Employers also may discriminate against gay men in response to the desires of the majority of employees. If employers consider mixing heterosexual and homosexual employees distracting and detrimental to productivity, the authors said the employers may consider it profitable to discriminate.

Gay men also may experience labor market discrimination because customers may not want to interact with them, thus influencing hiring practices. “If customers prefer to interact with heterosexual employees, the owner will act on the customer’s taste for discrimination,” the authors said.
Finally, discrimination may occur as a result of anti-gay attitudes associated with AIDS and misunderstanding as to how HIV is transmitted. Previous research shows that people with HIV/AIDS have higher rates of absenteeism from work. The authors theorize that biased employers may be reluctant to hire gay men because they are concerned about a loss of productivity if a worker becomes infected with HIV/AIDS.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

GO SOX


Fall seems to have finally made its way to Boston, just in time for the Fall Classic. Crisp days, dark cool nights and a World Series game at Fenway tonight.

My biggest challenge is making it through the game. First pitch isn't until 8:35p, just minutes before my traditional bed-time.
So, Mr. Beckett, get 'em out early and often and, Monsieurs Ortiz, Ramirez and Lowell, let's get some big runs early so I can celebrate AND sleep.

GO SOX. GO SOX GO SOX.

Monday, October 22, 2007

Kurt Eichenwald-what you didn't know

Remember when NY Times Kurt Eichenwald broke the story of online child pornography a few years ago? It was an amazing piece of journalism that led to congressional hearings and, more importantly, saved at least one child's life. Eichenwald received a lot of criticism for becoming "too close" to his teen-age source and left the Times a few months later. He took a job at Portfolio, a new, high-profile business magazine, but recently left that. His career is all but over.

Listen to this NPR interview (link above) to find out why:

Monday, October 15, 2007

On Multi-tasking


I fight the urge to multi-task dozens of times a day. Here's a quote that reminds me why I should keep up the fight:

“Multi-tasking is dead. It never worked and it never will. Intelligent people love to sing its praises because it gives them permission to avoid the much more challenging alternative: focusing on one thing.”

–Timothy Ferriss

Whatever happened to hard work?

This article in Business Week burned me up. Capitalism at its best/worst. Parents paying $40,000 or more (that's the right number of zeroes) for a "college admissions consultant." Because if you're spending $100 grand for school, don't you want the very best?

Oh, did I mention that the counseling begins in eighth grade?



IN DEPTH
By Susan Berfield and Anne Tergesen

I Can Get Your Kid into an Ivy
Michele Hernandez boasts that 95% of her teenage clients are accepted by their first-choice school. Her price: As much as $40,000 a student

As I listened to my 8th period English teacher drone on for the third time about how Finny, a character in A Separate Peace, was indeed the main character although he was not the narrator, it finally dawned on me that this was not the exciting world of high school that I had hoped for.

This is how Andrew Garza began an essay in his application to Haverford College. It was a 1,200-word piece that established him as an intellectually curious young man. It was crafted to appeal specifically to the admissions officers at the small liberal arts school. And it was the idea of his high-priced college admissions coach, Michele A. Hernandez. Garza attended a private school in Switzerland, and that worried Hernandez: She thought he might appear to be a privileged teenager without much substance. So she advised him to write about why he had left his public high school in suburban New Jersey. "We had to make it seem like he didn't want to be around so many rich kids. We spun a whole story about him taking the initiative to leave in order to broaden his experience," Hernandez says. "It was his initiative. But he wouldn't have written about it."

Today Andrew is a senior at Haverford, studying sociology and economics. His father, John, paid Hernandez $18,000 for 18 months' worth of advice. "It is a lot of money," says Garza, a manager at Abitibi-Consolidated (ABY ) in New York. "But if you look at it as an investment, it's not a bad one."



A DIVISIVE FIGURE
Hernandez may well be the most expensive college coach in America, charging as much as $40,000 to get a student into an elite college. As one of this fast-growing industry's most visible practitioners, she uses methods that are publicly scorned by rivals but are nonetheless becoming part of the profession's standard operating procedures. She is a divisive figure in an already controversial field, regularly drawing condemnation from admissions officers who say she is selling advantage to people who least need it.

If the notoriety sometimes bothers her, Hernandez is not about to let on. To her critics, she says: "I'd be an idiot to charge half of what I can. Parents can always hire a lesser person." That might sound arrogant, but she is clearly proud of turning her one-woman operation, Hernandez College Consulting, into what amounts to a luxury brand. Her clients, mostly people of some means and great ambition, rave about the personal service: the regular phone calls to their kids (you have to go above and beyond); the academic help (read the book Poetic Meter and Poetic Form); the "brand" positioning (classics would be a great angle); the advice about which colleges to consider and where not to bother; the hours she devotes to each application.

Despite being asked to pay fees that are as much as 10 times higher than average, these well-intentioned, well-heeled parents keep calling. And calling. Since she started seven years ago, Hernandez, who is 40, says she has worked with some 150 students, 95% of whom, she claims, were accepted at their first choice of college. She hints that among them have been the progeny of chief executives, financiers, billionaires.

Hiring help is not the privilege of only the wealthy, of course. According to the Independent Educational Consultants Assn., 22% of first-year students at private colleges—perhaps as many as 58,000 kids—had worked with some kind of consultant.



THE INSIDE SCOOP
But few of the 4,000 independent college counselors now scattered around the country can match Hernandez' influence or earning power. Early on, she began offering college-admissions counseling for students in eighth grade—yes, eighth grade—an approach that is becoming more common. Since 2005, she has run application boot camps in Manhattan and Santa Monica, Calif., which this summer cost $9,500 and are sure to attract imitators. Hernandez says she earned almost $1 million last year. She drives a BMW convertible. And she just moved near Middlebury, Vt., where she and her husband own 117 acres on Snake Mountain.

What makes her own story so compelling is that Hernandez is an insider-turned-outcast. A former admissions officer at Dartmouth College, she dared to reveal secrets of the opaque selection process in her book, A Is for Admission: The Insider's Guide to Getting Into the Ivy League and Other Top Colleges, and then to build a thriving business that helps people game the system. As she says to parents: "You don't want to pay $180,000 for some piddling school when, by spending a little extra, your kid could get into Yale." She insinuates herself so deeply into her students' lives and is so unabashed about her money-making that she has come to be regarded either as operating at the leading edge of her profession or its cynical extreme.

Hernandez had been out of college for four years when she returned to her alma mater, Dartmouth, as an assistant director of admissions in 1993. It was a job of convenience (she had married a professor there, Jorge Hernandez) and one for which she was eminently qualified but temperamentally unsuited.

Hernandez speaks twice as fast as most people, reads as if it were a competitive sport, and is forceful, opinionated, and stubborn. These traits were not always appreciated by her colleagues. At one point, the dean of admissions, Karl Furstenberg, reprimanded her for not being more deliberate in her evaluations. Hernandez had been a valedictorian of her high school in Armonk, N.Y., graduated Phi Beta Kappa from college, earned a master's degree in English and comparative literature from Columbia University, and was exasperated by the criticism. She still is. "I thought he should bow in my direction for working so hard."

Hernandez began keeping a journal, chronicling what she regarded as the essential workings of the selection process. It wasn't revenge or ambition, she says, that motivated her to turn her notes into a book, though later she would be accused of both. It was indignation: She believed Ivy League schools weren't being truthful about how they reviewed students' applications. "We were forced to misrepresent things," she says. "Parents kept asking if there was an equation we used. There was." Privately, the schools referred to it as the Academic Index, a formula based on test scores and academic standing used to rank applicants. "It was the secret everyone in admissions knew," Hernandez recalls. "But we couldn't tell parents that. It bothered me."

The promise of the first inside account of what seemed to be an unpredictable process, along with expert advice about how students can distinguish themselves in their applications, was irresistible to publishers. After a bidding war, Hernandez received a $450,000 advance from Warner Books. One condition of her contract was that she tell no one about the book, not even at Dartmouth where she was still employed. "I felt bad for Karl because I knew the book would get a lot of attention, and it would look bad for him," says Hernandez. "But I was very complimentary toward Dartmouth."

While she was working on the book, her husband was denied tenure, an event that has come to confuse the circumstances of her eventual departure from Dartmouth in May, 1997. Five months later, A Is for Admission was published. "This book is not aimed at guaranteeing admission to an Ivy League school," she wrote in the introduction. "However, it will teach you how to maximize your chances and show you how to present yourself in the best possible light." At the time, Furstenberg told The Chronicle of Higher Education that the book was a betrayal of trust: "It offers only a glib, superficial look at college admissions. It plays into some of the paranoia and anxiety that surround this process, and in that sense is a disservice." (Neither he nor anyone at Dartmouth would comment for this story.)

The book was a success and became Hernandez' most effective advertisement when she went into college consulting full-time in 2000. It gave her name recognition—so much so that even after her divorce in 2001 from Jorge she continued to use his surname. And it helped establish her bona fides among parents, many of whom are inclined, as she is, to regard admission to the top schools as a high-stakes game that should be played using any advantage.

Those well-meaning, chronically striving parents were comfortable hiring expensive experts. Their eager-to-please kids were accustomed to being hovered over. The conditions were ideal for Hernandez. Already, a few high-priced, high-impact counselors had begun to assert themselves, not oblivious to the disapproval of educators but unconcerned all the same. Among them was Katherine Cohen, an Ivy League graduate once employed part-time by Yale to read applications, who had founded IvyWise in 1998. When Hernandez first heard about her, Cohen was asking $28,995 for her two-year platinum package. "I realized she was making a living doing this," Hernandez says. "I increased my price after that."

She would soon have a few more credentials that could help attract clients. She wrote two other books: The Middle School Years: Achieving the Best Education for Your Child, Grades 5-8 and Acing the College Application: How to Maximize Your Chances for Admission to the College of Your Choice. And she earned a quickie doctorate in education from Nova Southeastern University in Florida, where she had moved in 1998. About that degree she is candid: "It's kind of crappy compared to my other ones. But I figured it would be good to have. I am a doctor. It gives me some credibility."

Families pay Hernandez as much as they do because she promises not just substitute parenting but parenting in the extreme. She selects classes for students, reviews their homework, and prods them to make an impression on teachers. She checks on the students' grades, scores, rankings. She tells parents when to hire tutors and then makes sure the kids do the extra work. She vets their vacation schedules. She plans their summers. And through it all, she is always available to contend with the college angst that can consume whole families. Parents value her confidence; kids, mostly, appreciate her enthusiasm.

From the beginning, Hernandez pledged all that work would be invisible. Like her peers, she operates in stealth, mindful that if admissions officers find out a student was coached they will regard the application with suspicion. Hernandez rarely speaks with high school counselors. She never calls a college on a student's behalf. And she is especially careful not to leave any fingerprints on the application essays, even as she edits seven, eight, sometimes 10 drafts. "But I'm not afraid of admissions officers," she says. "If they could tell, how would I be so successful?"

Admissions officers, of course, have little respect for the work of Hernandez and other consultants. "I believe that most of the funds expended on independent counselors are simply wasted," Jeffrey Brenzel, the dean of admissions at Yale, wrote in an e-mail. "We do not believe they have much, if any, effect on who we accept."

Hernandez' apparent success depends, too, on how well she manages the expectations of the kids and their parents. She says nearly all of her students are accepted to the school they most want to attend. But in many cases, she strongly suggests which college would be a reasonable first choice. She calls that strategizing. First she writes a 12-to-18 page report for each new student, based on transcripts, test scores, and other accomplishments, that gives the likelihood of their gaining admission to the schools they are interested in. "I have written: 'You have 0% chance of getting into Harvard early decision. Don't apply,'" she says. "People pay for accuracy. I know exactly what it takes to get into Harvard." Her apparent candor serves another purpose, too: Such an assessment makes it unlikely that she will fail.

When she begins working with kids already in their junior year of high school, she is naturally a bit constrained in what she can advise after that initial evaluation. "At that age, they have what they have," she says. When John Garza contacted Hernandez in January, 2002, Andrew already knew he wanted to attend Haverford. Hernandez told him it would be a reach. Then she started suggesting ways he could fashion himself into a more attractive applicant.

Over the next year, as she does with most of her clients, she worked with him by e-mail and over the phone, occasionally in person. She helped him navigate the International Baccalaureate curriculum, advising him to sign up for classes that U.S. colleges would recognize as difficult. She directed his interests. "I helped in ways that would look good and let him be true to himself," she says. Early in his junior year, Andrew had become involved with Habitat for Humanity, though his contributions were modest. Hernandez talked to him about the importance of leadership: In his senior year, he served as president of the local chapter. She encouraged him to make a bigger impact: He helped raise $4,000 to build homes in Kyrgyzstan and Hungary by expanding the organization's sandwich-making business on campus.

Then she suggested he write his main application essay about something else altogether. "The Habitat for Humanity theme, the tug on your heartstrings, sounded too common," says Andrew. So he tried another topic that would reveal more about his intellectual enthusiasms: how running helped him understand the existentialist philosophy he was reading about. "She gave me specific suggestions about the essay to form one cogent image of who I am," says Andrew.

Crafting that singular, convincing portrait of the student is central to Hernandez' approach. She considers sentimental pursuits a distraction and those done out of obligation misguided. So it went with Ben Selznick, who started to work with Hernandez in the spring of 2002 when he was a junior. His father, David, a tax attorney in Armonk, N.Y., paid $16,500 for about a year's worth of advice. "We had a very motivated son who wanted to attend a top university," he says. "We wanted to give him every opportunity we could."

Ben was a talented drummer, and Hernandez told him to concentrate on his music. He recalls conversations about his schedule: "I was on the track team and she asked: 'Are you going to be a track star?' So I quit and got a job as a drum teacher at a local music school." She put the kibosh on plans to be a camp counselor, too; instead he spent several weeks that summer at the Berklee College of Music in Boston.

During his senior year, Ben joined a couple of singing groups, took more music classes, and completed an independent study in composition. "A lot of it came from me realizing that music could be a good way to pitch myself," he says. At Hernandez' suggestion, he visited Dartmouth. It became his first choice. Hernandez then told him to apply early decision, which is binding. (Almost all of her clients apply early somewhere because the acceptance rate is higher than during regular admission.)

He applied as a music major. Ben had been uncertain about how to frame his main essay until Hernandez advised him to write about the experience of listening to his favorite piece of classical music, Wagner's Tannhäuser Overture, and its influence on his own creative process. Ben was accepted to Dartmouth. He graduated in May with a degree in religious studies and is now working as a paralegal at a law firm outside of Boston.

Andrew and Ben were typical Hernandez clients: bright, eager, and just months away from applying to college. Before long, though, she began to promote her services for younger kids. Hiring Hernandez to work with 14-year-olds became a more tempting proposition for parents as they watched the acceptance rates at elite schools drop. By 2004 she was signing up a new eighth- or ninth-grade student almost every month. She had also moved to Portland, Ore., remarried, given birth to her second child, and begun calling herself "America's Premiere College Consultant."



FINDING THE 'SELLING POINT'
What sets Hernandez apart these days is the intensity with which she extends into adolescence the Brand Me imperative. Her approach with these students depends on sussing out and then encouraging their own inclinations. If someone says she likes photography, Hernandez might suggest she take photos of the homeless, then mount an exhibit as a way to raise money. "A kid wouldn't come up with that idea on their own," she says. "They don't know what colleges are looking for." Hernandez advised a student working on a nanotechnology project to e-mail famous scientists and compile the exchanges into a book. "If you did that, I guarantee you'd get into any school," she said to the girl. To another student who enjoys studying Latin, Hernandez suggested learning Greek over the summer, too: "It's a great selling point." When a ninth-grade boy said he might be interested in his school's tech club, she told him: "You can take it over and take it in a new direction."

Today, Hernandez has 80 clients. And yet, unlike Cohen of IvyWise, who now has a staff of 15 providing help with applications for nursery school on up, Hernandez is still on her own, answering every phone call, sending every e-mail. She doesn't want to manage employees and, in any case, doesn't believe her knowledge can be transferred or replicated. That, of course, places a natural limit on her business. In 2005 she hadn't yet reached it but was close enough that she began looking for other ways to expand her operation. She soon came up with an idea that would again be derided by educators and embraced by parents.

Hernandez and Mimi Doe, a parenting expert with whom she had just written the book, Don't Worry, You'll Get In: 100 Winning Tips for Stress-Free College Admissions, announced their first application boot camp. It was a $7,800, four-day summer program for students about to enter their senior year. Doe and Hernandez promised they would leave with completed applications and a strategy for where to seek admission.

All 15 spaces for the New York seminar, held at the luxury Kitano hotel, were snapped up in weeks. In the summers of 2006 and 2007, Hernandez and Doe raised the price, first to $8,200 and then to $9,500, and still filled one session in Manhattan and another at the Shutters Hotel in Santa Monica. Next year they may hire others to help edit the essays so they can open the program to more students. They will charge $12,500.

But is it worth it? There is no way to verify her claims. Even Andrew and Ben, who respect her expertise and dedication, express some ambivalence. "I would like to think that I would have gotten in anyway," says Andrew. "But the reality is, you never know. I think Michele eliminated the risk that I wouldn't get in." Ben, mulling over his college experience in the months after graduation, puts it this way: "I'm thankful to Michele. I didn't think she was indispensable, though. Could I have done it myself? Maybe. Could I have gone somewhere else and been happy? Yes."

Certainly, plenty of kids delight in the opportunities consultants like Hernandez make available to them. Many thrive under high expectations; others aren't undone by the sacrifices called for. Ben, for example, has no regrets about following Hernandez' advice, even if it meant giving up the camaraderie of the track team and summer camp. Andrew's experience led to a job with Habitat in Mexico for one year before he began Haverford. And during college vacations, he worked with microlending programs in Latin America.

But, in general, the intense pressure to succeed is a big reason the incidence of anxiety, depression, and drug use is as high among children of the affluent as it is among children of the inner city, according to Columbia University psychologist Suniya S. Luthar. "Young people perceive that their whole lives are building to this moment of applications, rejections, acceptances. They see it as either you make it or you are doomed to a second-class existence," she says. Even those who do get into top schools may suffer the consequences of their success. Barry Schwartz, a psychology professor at Swarthmore College, says: "Those who excel enough to get into Harvard or Stanford are likely to be less inspired students once that goal has been achieved."

Set aside for the moment the concerns of the affluent, though. There is another fear about expensive counselors such as Hernandez: that they help distort an educational system that can already leave the less privileged at a disadvantage. As Ben says, "It's so not a level playing field to start with, and then you go beyond. I just told friends it was my dad's idea to hire her."

Hernandez, meanwhile, is finding new ways to extend her brand. She and Doe have created a virtual boot camp ($2,999). They have put together a 60-page book, Set Yourself Apart: The Ultimate Guide to Top High School Summer Programs ($189). They have a partnership with two SAT tutors who on Hernandez' Web site offer five hours of help over the phone ($1,600). And Hernandez and Doe are hoping to link up with a travel consultant, someone who could plan family trips to visit colleges. "That will be like Ralph Lauren's Purple Label," Hernandez says. "It won't be for everybody."

Sunday, October 14, 2007

How To Talk to Kids


I'm a huge fan of Ira Glass's "This Amerian Life" and could blog about it every week. If you don't listen to it on NPR, you should, or atleast get the podcast.

But this week's show, especiallly the opening and the last scene with Dan Savage, is classic about what's wrong with how adults deal with kids.

Click on the link above.

I loved this.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

This is Breaking News?

I live in Boston, allegedly the intellectual capital of these United States. And, on a day when further revelations about Blackwater's fiascos and Al Gore won the Nobel Prize, boston.com, the website of the Boston Globe (owned by the New York Times, no less), dropped everything to bring us this headline:

BREAKING NEWS: California Department of Justice investigators began serving search warrants today in connection with the death of Anna Nicole Smith, a person close to the investigation told The Associated Press.The former Playboy Playmate died of an accidental drug overdose in February at a Florida hotel. Several people close to the model have fallen under suspicion since her death, including her psychiatrist Dr. Khristine Eroshevich. California Attorney General Jerry Brown was expected to make an announcement later today. --Developing

TODD MAKES THE FRONT PAGE

Last Sunday, my family and I went to the Lincoln, MA, Fire Department Open House.

My two-year old nephew, Jake, is obsessed with fire trucks. And, I was the lucky uncle who escorted on to his first gig.

And our efforts made the front page of the Lincoln Journal this week!


See the link above

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Join My Team

Come on, Tom. The Patriots are sure bets for the Super Bowl. Don't you need a new kind of adventure?

Take a gander at the above link to Mr. Brady's latest ad campaign.

Grrrrr.

Monday, October 8, 2007

Marathon Madness


It was a disaster in Chicago yesterday, where summer rolled in and near 90 degree temperatures interferred with the annual Chicago Marathon. At least one person died (as it turns out, it was not heat-related)and dozens more were rushed to the hospital. And, I can't help but recall the summer a few years ago, when hundreds of Chicagoans died from heat-related illness.

Of course, I felt more in touch with yesteday's race, as it came a day after my own heat-related, near disastrous 1/2 marathon in Hollis, New Hampshire. I finished in a pathetic time, but as I read the news about Chicago, I couldn't help just to be thankful to finish at all. No, I wasn't about to die (it was, after all, only half the distance of the real thing), but at mile 9, my body just gave up. I couldn't figure out what happened to me. Sure, it was 85 degrees and humid, but, in the moment, you blame anything but Mother Nature.

But dang it, still I want to complete a marathon before I'm 40.

(This picture is from last year's run. I haven't seen the images from this year's race, but don't know that i'd care to show how I looked)

Thursday, October 4, 2007

"The United States Does Not Torture"


Not even George Orwell could create this scenario. Forget "1984." Twenty years from now, high school students will be reading transcripts of this government's actions over the past seven years to understand the power of a government gone mad.

And it was great to see the Today show this morning lead off with newly-found Diana video and Brittany's custody crisis. Not a word, NOT A WORD, in the first hour about this slightly more urgent matter.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/04/washington/04interrogate.html/

One Down, Ten To Go



Josh Beckett pitched a beauty last night at Fenway--a four-hit, no walk gem.

Anything more I say here will mean the end of the season. So I stop. And pray.

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Great Reads

I have more than 12 books and five magazines on my night table. I can't seem to get more than a few pages into any one of them before being compelled to move on to something else. I guess that may be the strange benefit of the horror of these difficult times. Amazing journalism that cuts through all of the crap (can you hear me, CNN, ye master of yesterday's "News Alert" on Britney's custody battle?).

Two books worth noting are Washington Post reporter Thomas Rick's Fiasco, an amazing, jaw-dropping synthesis of everything that went wrong leading upto and into the Iraqi War. And, now I am reading Lawrence Wright's The Looming Tower, a Pulitzer-Prize winning account of the rise of Al Quada. Journalism in the best sense of the world. We've all heard and read far too much about what has gone wrong over the past five years, but i encourage you to pick up one or both of these books. You'll be angrier, certainly, but I can't help but believe that knowing what has happened will make all of us do more to ensure that it doesn't happen again. Sure, I am a big fat liberal democratic, but the hubris of government of any kind shouldn't be taken lightly by any of us.

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Uncle Bill



A great piece in the October issue of The Atlantic about the amazing work that BILL is doing. This slide show, narrated by that wonderful drawl-y voice, is worth taking a few minutes to watch.

http://www.theatlantic.com/slideshows/clinton/

No, I'm not going to discuss Hillary here. I don't know what to think. Except to be fairly certain that she will be the Democratic nominee and will take on Giuliani. That's almost as scary as the aforementioned Yankees vs. Sox.

Let's Not Repeat '67


Lots of talk in Beantown about the Red Sox and reminding us that this is the 40th anniversary of the "miracle" season of 1967, where the Sox came back from the hands of defeat to make it to the World Series. Great story. But the punch line? THEY LOST.

So, as the '07 crew heads for the playoffs against the Anaheim Angels (6:30p Eastern Wednesday at Fenway), let's hope for the real thing. Manny is back in the line-up; the over-hyped (and overpaid) JD Drew is finally hitting; and Dice-K seems to be holding his own, but I'm still concerned that this isn't the same team that had a commanding lead in June and July. Shit. I shouldnt' have said that. Now it's over for certain.

Really, though, isn't all that we want a Red Sox-Yankees League Championship Series?

Monday, October 1, 2007

It's Todd, Not Scott


Here. I've done it. I'm starting a blog. A year ago, I hardly knew what the word meant. Now, I am one. Or I have one. Whatever.

The name came to me fairly easily. For nearly all of my 38 years, I have been called "Scott," not my given name, "Todd." It happened again last week with a friend of fifteen years and my personal trainer (I know, I know, I'm one of those that needs to use every opportunity possible to mention my PT). I don't get it and, to be honest, don't like it. I hate the name Scott, or at least I hate it for me. I think of a nerdy, four-eyed, dark-haired, straight-hair 18 year old that was the last one picked on his high school phys ed. team for years.

Ok, that was me.

I have no idea what I will post here or even if anyone will read it after one shot. My guess is that it will be a hodge podge of news commentary (I am a media junkie); observations about culture, mostly tv and books; and maybe even an occasional wry observation about life as it is.

I hope you enjoy.